http://watchshock.com/users/ Watch Shock Users Topic: Spec form suggestion - strap width en Sun, 12 Jul 2026 07:34:39 +0000 http://watchshock.com/users/topic/spec-form-suggestion#post-19 Mon, 13 Apr 2009 09:54:45 +0000 Riley 19@http://watchshock.com/users/ <p>It's been added. </p> http://watchshock.com/users/topic/spec-form-suggestion#post-18 Sat, 11 Apr 2009 14:32:29 +0000 Riley 18@http://watchshock.com/users/ <p>OK. I'll add that to the spec form. </p> http://watchshock.com/users/topic/spec-form-suggestion#post-16 Sat, 11 Apr 2009 05:38:06 +0000 bjornkeizers 16@http://watchshock.com/users/ <p>Riley, </p> <p>Sorry, I should've been clearer. I'm referring to the strap width in mm. I.e. Seiko Monster has a 20mm strap, SKX009 takes a 22mm. The common term would be 'lug width'. </p> <p>-Bjorn </p> http://watchshock.com/users/topic/spec-form-suggestion#post-15 Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:53:48 +0000 Riley 15@http://watchshock.com/users/ <p>What do you think is the best way to phrase the specification?</p> <p>Maximum wrist size or the actual measurements of the straps? Or something else? </p> http://watchshock.com/users/topic/spec-form-suggestion#post-14 Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:07:45 +0000 bjornkeizers 14@http://watchshock.com/users/ <p>Hello, </p> <p>There's one crucial measurement missing from the watch spec forum: namely the strap size. Quite an important figure when strap shopping </p>